DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Mercury Mountaineer vs 2000 Ford Explorer Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Explorer

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

68.5–69.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MercuryMakeFord
MountaineerModelExplorer
2000Model year2000
Off-road vehicleBody typeOff-road vehicle
7Seats5
5Doors3/5

Performance

9,5 s0–100 km/h—
177 km/hTop speed180 km/h
3996 ccEngine displacement3958 cc
208 HPPower155 HP
339 NmTorque298 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
83 ltFuel tank72 lt
15,7 ltUrban consumption—
12,4 ltExtra-urban consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears5
235/75 R15Tyre size225/70 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4990 mmLength4429 mm
1875 mmWidth1783 mm
1830 mmHeight1714 mm
1880 KgWeight1671 Kg
2830 mmWheelbase2593 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Mercury Mountaineer and 2000 Ford Explorer approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Explorer leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…