DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Land Rover Range Rover vs 2000 Mercury Mountaineer Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mercury Mountaineer

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

67.5–68.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Land RoverMakeMercury
Range RoverModelMountaineer
2000Model year2000
EstateBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats7
5Doors5

Performance

10,5 s0–100 km/h9,5 s
190 km/hTop speed177 km/h
3947 ccEngine displacement3996 cc
185 HPPower208 HP
340 NmTorque339 Nm
8Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
100 ltFuel tank83 lt
22,5 ltUrban consumption15,7 lt
12,6 ltExtra-urban consumption12,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears4
235/70R16Tyre size235/75 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4713 mmLength4990 mm
1853 mmWidth1875 mm
1853 mmHeight1830 mm
2120 KgWeight1880 Kg
2745 mmWheelbase2830 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Land Rover Range Rover and 2000 Mercury Mountaineer approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mercury Mountaineer leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…