DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2008 Mercury Milan vs 2008 Kia Optima Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mercury Milan

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

69.25–68.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MercuryMakeKia
MilanModelOptima
2008Model year2008
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

7,3 s0–100 km/h—
188 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2967 ccEngine displacement2656 cc
212 HPPower188 HP
271 NmTorque247 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
68 ltFuel tank62 lt
11,2 ltUrban consumption10,7 lt
8,1 ltExtra-urban consumption—
—Average consumption9,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
205/50 R16Tyre size205/60 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4862 mmLength4735 mm
1834 mmWidth1805 mm
1417 mmHeight1480 mm
1535 KgWeight1491 Kg
2728 mmWheelbase2720 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2008 Mercury Milan and 2008 Kia Optima approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mercury Milan leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…