DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2008 GMC Canyon vs 2008 Mercury Milan Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mercury Milan

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

68.5–69.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

GMCMakeMercury
CanyonModelMilan
2008Model year2008
Pick-upBody typeSedan
5/6Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

—0–100 km/h7,3 s
0 km/hTop speed188 km/h
2921 ccEngine displacement2967 cc
185 HPPower212 HP
258 NmTorque271 Nm
4Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
74 ltFuel tank68 lt
11,7 ltUrban consumption11,2 lt
9,0 ltExtra-urban consumption8,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
205/75 R15; 225/70 R15Tyre size205/50 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5260 mmLength4862 mm
1717 mmWidth1834 mm
1656 mmHeight1417 mm
1668 KgWeight1535 Kg
3200 mmWheelbase2728 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2008 GMC Canyon and 2008 Mercury Milan approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mercury Milan leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…