DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 Mercury Cougar vs 2002 BMW Z3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mercury Cougar

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

59.5–59.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MercuryMakeBMW
CougarModelZ3
2002Model year2002
CoupeBody typeCabriolet
4Seats2
3Doors2

Performance

10,0 s0–100 km/h10,4 s
210 km/hTop speed196 km/h
1988 ccEngine displacement1895 cc
126 HPPower118 HP
177 NmTorque190 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank51 lt
9,8 ltUrban consumption11 lt
6,9 ltExtra-urban consumption6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/60 R15Tyre size225/50 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4700 mmLength4050 mm
1770 mmWidth1740 mm
1320 mmHeight1288 mm
1300 KgWeight1220 Kg
2700 mmWheelbase2446 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 Mercury Cougar and 2002 BMW Z3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mercury Cougar leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…