DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 MG ZS vs 2002 Mercury Cougar Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

MG ZS

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

60.25–59.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MG ZSSpecificationMercury Cougar
MGMakeMercury
ZSModelCougar
2002Model year2002
SedanBody typeCoupe
5Seats4
4Doors3

Performance

MG ZSSpecificationMercury Cougar
9,5 s0–100 km/h10,0 s
193 km/hTop speed210 km/h
1994 ccEngine displacement1988 cc
113 HPPower126 HP
260 NmTorque177 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

MG ZSSpecificationMercury Cougar
DieselFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank60 lt
7,8 ltUrban consumption9,8 lt
4,3 ltExtra-urban consumption6,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

MG ZSSpecificationMercury Cougar
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/50 R16Tyre size205/60 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

MG ZSSpecificationMercury Cougar
4520 mmLength4700 mm
1700 mmWidth1770 mm
1390 mmHeight1320 mm
1225 KgWeight1300 Kg
2620 mmWheelbase2700 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 MG ZS and 2002 Mercury Cougar approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, MG ZS leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…