DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 Mercury Cougar vs 2002 MG ZS Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

MG ZS

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

59.5–60.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Mercury CougarSpecificationMG ZS
MercuryMakeMG
CougarModelZS
2002Model year2002
CoupeBody typeSedan
4Seats5
3Doors4

Performance

Mercury CougarSpecificationMG ZS
10,0 s0–100 km/h9,5 s
210 km/hTop speed193 km/h
1988 ccEngine displacement1994 cc
126 HPPower113 HP
177 NmTorque260 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Mercury CougarSpecificationMG ZS
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
60 ltFuel tank55 lt
9,8 ltUrban consumption7,8 lt
6,9 ltExtra-urban consumption4,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Mercury CougarSpecificationMG ZS
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/60 R15Tyre size205/50 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Mercury CougarSpecificationMG ZS
4700 mmLength4520 mm
1770 mmWidth1700 mm
1320 mmHeight1390 mm
1300 KgWeight1225 Kg
2700 mmWheelbase2620 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 Mercury Cougar and 2002 MG ZS approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, MG ZS leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…