DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 Mercury Cougar vs 2002 MG ZR Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

MG ZR

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

59.5–60.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Mercury CougarSpecificationMG ZR
MercuryMakeMG
CougarModelZR
2002Model year2002
CoupeBody typeHatchback
4Seats5
3Doors3/5

Performance

Mercury CougarSpecificationMG ZR
10,0 s0–100 km/h10,0 s
210 km/hTop speed185 km/h
1988 ccEngine displacement1994 cc
126 HPPower113 HP
177 NmTorque260 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Mercury CougarSpecificationMG ZR
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
60 ltFuel tank50 lt
9,8 ltUrban consumption7,7 lt
6,9 ltExtra-urban consumption4,2 lt
—Average consumption5,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Mercury CougarSpecificationMG ZR
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/60 R15Tyre size205/50 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Mercury CougarSpecificationMG ZR
4700 mmLength4011 mm
1770 mmWidth1690 mm
1320 mmHeight1400 mm
1300 KgWeight1155 Kg
2700 mmWheelbase2502 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 Mercury Cougar and 2002 MG ZR approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, MG ZR leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…