DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1990 Mercury Cougar vs 1991 Land Rover Range Rover Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mercury Cougar

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

67.5–66.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MercuryMakeLand Rover
CougarModelRange Rover
1990Model year1991
—Body typeOff-road vehicle
—Seats5
—Doors4

Performance

—0–100 km/h10,7 s
0 km/hTop speed179 km/h
3797 ccEngine displacement3947 cc
220 HPPower188 HP
292 NmTorque319 Nm
6Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
0 ltFuel tank82 lt
—Urban consumption18,2 lt
—Extra-urban consumption10,5 lt
—Average consumption13,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

—Drivetrain4x4
—Gears5
—Tyre size205/80 R16
—ABSYes

Dimensions

—Length4449 mm
—Width1818 mm
—Height1790 mm
—Weight1980 Kg
—Wheelbase2540 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1990 Mercury Cougar and 1991 Land Rover Range Rover approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mercury Cougar leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…