DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1991 Land Rover Range Rover vs 1990 Mercury Cougar Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mercury Cougar

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

66.5–67.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Land RoverMakeMercury
Range RoverModelCougar
1991Model year1990
Off-road vehicleBody type—
5Seats—
4Doors—

Performance

10,7 s0–100 km/h—
179 km/hTop speed0 km/h
3947 ccEngine displacement3797 cc
188 HPPower220 HP
319 NmTorque292 Nm
8Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
82 ltFuel tank0 lt
18,2 ltUrban consumption—
10,5 ltExtra-urban consumption—
13,4 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain—
5Gears—
205/80 R16Tyre size—
YesABS—

Dimensions

4449 mmLength—
1818 mmWidth—
1790 mmHeight—
1980 KgWeight—
2540 mmWheelbase—

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1991 Land Rover Range Rover and 1990 Mercury Cougar approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mercury Cougar leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…