DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Mercedes-Benz ML vs 2003 Chevrolet Corvette Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mercedes-Benz ML

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.5 points.

83.75–83.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Mercedes-BenzMakeChevrolet
MLModelCorvette
2003Model year2003
Off-road vehicleBody typeCabriolet
5Seats2
5Doors2

Performance

6,9 s0–100 km/h4,7 s
232 km/hTop speed281 km/h
5439 ccEngine displacement5665 cc
347 HPPower355 HP
510 NmTorque253 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
93 ltFuel tank72 lt
19,7 ltUrban consumption19,3 lt
11,4 ltExtra-urban consumption8,9 lt
14,5 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears6
285/50 R18WTyre size245/45 R18; 275/40 R18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4635 mmLength4566 mm
1833 mmWidth1870 mm
1820 mmHeight1211 mm
2085 KgWeight1475 Kg
2820 mmWheelbase2656 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Mercedes-Benz ML and 2003 Chevrolet Corvette approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mercedes-Benz ML leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.5 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…