DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2005 Cadillac Escalade vs 2003 Mercedes-Benz ML Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Cadillac Escalade

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

84.5–83.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

CadillacMakeMercedes-Benz
EscaladeModelML
2005Model year2003
EstateBody typeOff-road vehicle
8Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

8,0 s0–100 km/h6,9 s
177 km/hTop speed232 km/h
5328 ccEngine displacement5439 cc
299 HPPower347 HP
440 NmTorque510 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
98 ltFuel tank93 lt
—Urban consumption19,7 lt
—Extra-urban consumption11,4 lt
—Average consumption14,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
4Gears5
265/70 R17Tyre size285/50 R18W
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5052 mmLength4635 mm
2004 mmWidth1833 mm
1885 mmHeight1820 mm
2519 KgWeight2085 Kg
2946 mmWheelbase2820 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2005 Cadillac Escalade and 2003 Mercedes-Benz ML approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Cadillac Escalade leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…