DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Mercedes-Benz ML vs 2000 Lincoln LS Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Lincoln LS

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

80.75–81.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Mercedes-BenzMakeLincoln
MLModelLS
2000Model year2000
Off-road vehicleBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

8,4 s0–100 km/h—
210 km/hTop speed220 km/h
4266 ccEngine displacement3950 cc
272 HPPower256 HP
390 NmTorque354 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank68 lt
16,1 ltUrban consumption16 lt
9,4 ltExtra-urban consumption9 lt
11,9 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears4
275/55 R17 HTyre size215/60 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4587 mmLength4925 mm
1833 mmWidth1860 mm
1802 mmHeight1450 mm
2015 KgWeight—
2820 mmWheelbase2910 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Mercedes-Benz ML and 2000 Lincoln LS approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Lincoln LS leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…