DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Lincoln Continental vs 2000 Mercedes-Benz ML Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Lincoln Continental

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

81.75–80.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

LincolnMakeMercedes-Benz
ContinentalModelML
2000Model year2000
SedanBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h8,4 s
215 km/hTop speed210 km/h
4601 ccEngine displacement4266 cc
279 HPPower272 HP
373 NmTorque390 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
76 ltFuel tank70 lt
13,8 ltUrban consumption16,1 lt
9,8 ltExtra-urban consumption9,4 lt
—Average consumption11,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
4Gears5
225/60 R16Tyre size275/55 R17 H
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5260 mmLength4587 mm
1870 mmWidth1833 mm
1420 mmHeight1802 mm
1745 KgWeight2015 Kg
2770 mmWheelbase2820 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Lincoln Continental and 2000 Mercedes-Benz ML approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Lincoln Continental leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…