DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Mazda Xedos 9 vs 2000 Ford Galaxy Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Galaxy

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

56.5–57.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeFord
Xedos 9ModelGalaxy
2000Model year2000
SedanBody typeMinivan
5Seats7
4Doors5

Performance

10,7 s0–100 km/h12,7 s
202 km/hTop speed191 km/h
1995 ccEngine displacement2295 cc
143 HPPower145 HP
176 NmTorque203 Nm
6Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
68 ltFuel tank70 lt
11,1 ltUrban consumption14 lt
6,3 ltExtra-urban consumption7,8 lt
7,7 ltAverage consumption10,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/65 R15 VTyre size215/65 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4825 mmLength4641 mm
1770 mmWidth1810 mm
1395 mmHeight1732 mm
1410 KgWeight1610 Kg
2760 mmWheelbase2835 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Mazda Xedos 9 and 2000 Ford Galaxy approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Galaxy leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…