DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Citroen Evasion vs 2000 Mazda Xedos 9 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Citroen Evasion

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

57.25–56.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

CitroenMakeMazda
EvasionModelXedos 9
2000Model year2000
MinivanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

11,0 s0–100 km/h10,7 s
195 km/hTop speed202 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1995 cc
147 HPPower143 HP
235 NmTorque176 Nm
4Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank68 lt
14,8 ltUrban consumption11,1 lt
9 ltExtra-urban consumption6,3 lt
—Average consumption7,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/65 R15Tyre size205/65 R15 V
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4454 mmLength4825 mm
1812 mmWidth1770 mm
1710 mmHeight1395 mm
1575 KgWeight1410 Kg
2823 mmWheelbase2760 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Citroen Evasion and 2000 Mazda Xedos 9 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Citroen Evasion leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…