DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2010 Ford Explorer vs 2010 Mazda Tribute Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Explorer

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

77.5–76.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeMazda
ExplorerModelTribute
2010Model year2010
Off-road vehicleBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

158 km/hTop speed0 km/h
3998 ccEngine displacement3719 cc
212 HPPower273 HP
344 NmTorque270 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
85 ltFuel tank61 lt
21,4 ltUrban consumption—
15,7 ltExtra-urban consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
5Gears4
235/70 R16Tyre size235/70 R16 105 S
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4813 mmLength4395 mm
1832 mmWidth1825 mm
1814 mmHeight1765 mm
2005 KgWeight1590 Kg
2890 mmWheelbase2620 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2010 Ford Explorer and 2010 Mazda Tribute approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Explorer leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…