2009 • Mazda
Tribute
Mazda Tribute 3.0i V6 (240 Hp) 2009Overall Score73.75/100
2009 Mazda Tribute vs 2009 Jeep Commander Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2009 • Jeep
Commander
Jeep Commander 3.0 V6 24V CRD (218 Hp) 2009Overall Score74.5/100
WINNER
Jeep Commander
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
73.75–74.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Mazda TributeSpecificationJeep Commander
MazdaMakeJeep
TributeModelCommander
2009Model year2009
Off-road vehicleBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats7
5Doors5
Performance
Mazda TributeSpecificationJeep Commander
—0–100 km/h9,0 s
0 km/hTop speed191 km/h
2967 ccEngine displacement2987 cc
240 HPPower218 HP
302 NmTorque510 Nm
6Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Mazda TributeSpecificationJeep Commander
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
66 ltFuel tank78 lt
12,4 ltUrban consumption13,5 lt
9,4 ltExtra-urban consumption9,2 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Mazda TributeSpecificationJeep Commander
Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears5
235/70 R16Tyre size245/65R17
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Mazda TributeSpecificationJeep Commander
4442 mmLength4787 mm
—Width1900 mm
1783 mmHeight1826 mm
1540 KgWeight2245 Kg
2619 mmWheelbase2781 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2009 Mazda Tribute and 2009 Jeep Commander approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Jeep Commander leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…