DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2009 Jeep Commander vs 2009 Mazda Tribute Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Jeep Commander

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

74.5–73.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

JeepMakeMazda
CommanderModelTribute
2009Model year2009
Off-road vehicleBody typeOff-road vehicle
7Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

9,0 s0–100 km/h—
191 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2987 ccEngine displacement2967 cc
218 HPPower240 HP
510 NmTorque302 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
78 ltFuel tank66 lt
13,5 ltUrban consumption12,4 lt
9,2 ltExtra-urban consumption9,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
245/65R17Tyre size235/70 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4787 mmLength4442 mm
1900 mmWidth—
1826 mmHeight1783 mm
2245 KgWeight1540 Kg
2781 mmWheelbase2619 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2009 Jeep Commander and 2009 Mazda Tribute approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Jeep Commander leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…