2008 • Mazda
Tribute
Mazda Tribute 3.0i V6 (240 Hp) 2008Overall Score73.75/100
2008 Mazda Tribute vs 2008 Land Rover Discovery Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2008 • Land Rover
Discovery
Land Rover Discovery 2.7 TDI (190 Hp) 2008Overall Score73.5/100
WINNER
Mazda Tribute
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.
73.75–73.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Mazda TributeSpecificationLand Rover Discovery
MazdaMakeLand Rover
TributeModelDiscovery
2008Model year2008
Off-road vehicleBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats7
5Doors5
Performance
Mazda TributeSpecificationLand Rover Discovery
—0–100 km/h11,5 s
0 km/hTop speed180 km/h
2967 ccEngine displacement2720 cc
240 HPPower190 HP
302 NmTorque440 Nm
6Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Mazda TributeSpecificationLand Rover Discovery
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
66 ltFuel tank82 lt
12,4 ltUrban consumption11,5 lt
9,4 ltExtra-urban consumption8,2 lt
—Average consumption9,4 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Mazda TributeSpecificationLand Rover Discovery
Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears6
235/70 R16Tyre size255/55 R19
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Mazda TributeSpecificationLand Rover Discovery
4442 mmLength4835 mm
—Width2009 mm
1783 mmHeight1887 mm
1540 KgWeight2494 Kg
2619 mmWheelbase2885 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2008 Mazda Tribute and 2008 Land Rover Discovery approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mazda Tribute leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…