DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2008 Land Rover Discovery vs 2008 Mazda Tribute Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda Tribute

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

73.5–73.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Land RoverMakeMazda
DiscoveryModelTribute
2008Model year2008
Off-road vehicleBody typeOff-road vehicle
7Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

11,5 s0–100 km/h—
180 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2720 ccEngine displacement2967 cc
190 HPPower240 HP
440 NmTorque302 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
82 ltFuel tank66 lt
11,5 ltUrban consumption12,4 lt
8,2 ltExtra-urban consumption9,4 lt
9,4 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
255/55 R19Tyre size235/70 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4835 mmLength4442 mm
2009 mmWidth—
1887 mmHeight1783 mm
2494 KgWeight1540 Kg
2885 mmWheelbase2619 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2008 Land Rover Discovery and 2008 Mazda Tribute approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda Tribute leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…