DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Mazda Tribute vs 2004 Nissan Terrano Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda Tribute

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

63.25–62.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeNissan
TributeModelTerrano
2004Model year2004
Off-road vehicleBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
5Doors3

Performance

11,8 s0–100 km/h13,3 s
190 km/hTop speed170 km/h
2967 ccEngine displacement2953 cc
203 HPPower154 HP
265 NmTorque304 Nm
6Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
61 ltFuel tank72 lt
15,7 ltUrban consumption11,3 lt
9,3 ltExtra-urban consumption7,4 lt
12,8 ltAverage consumption8,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
4Gears5
235/70 R16 105 STyre size235/70 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4395 mmLength4217 mm
1825 mmWidth1755 mm
1765 mmHeight1830 mm
1590 KgWeight1760 Kg
2620 mmWheelbase2450 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Mazda Tribute and 2004 Nissan Terrano approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda Tribute leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…