DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Chrysler 300 vs 2004 Mazda Tribute Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda Tribute

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

62.5–63.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ChryslerMakeMazda
300ModelTribute
2004Model year2004
EstateBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

11,1 s0–100 km/h11,8 s
209 km/hTop speed190 km/h
2736 ccEngine displacement2967 cc
193 HPPower203 HP
258 NmTorque265 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
68 ltFuel tank61 lt
16,1 ltUrban consumption15,7 lt
8,4 ltExtra-urban consumption9,3 lt
11,2 ltAverage consumption12,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
4Gears4
225/60 R18Tyre size235/70 R16 105 S
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4999 mmLength4395 mm
1881 mmWidth1825 mm
1481 mmHeight1765 mm
1725 KgWeight1590 Kg
3048 mmWheelbase2620 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Chrysler 300 and 2004 Mazda Tribute approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda Tribute leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…