DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Mazda Tribute vs 2004 Chrysler 300 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda Tribute

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

63.25–62.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeChrysler
TributeModel300
2004Model year2004
Off-road vehicleBody typeEstate
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

11,8 s0–100 km/h11,1 s
190 km/hTop speed209 km/h
2967 ccEngine displacement2736 cc
203 HPPower193 HP
265 NmTorque258 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
61 ltFuel tank68 lt
15,7 ltUrban consumption16,1 lt
9,3 ltExtra-urban consumption8,4 lt
12,8 ltAverage consumption11,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears4
235/70 R16 105 STyre size225/60 R18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4395 mmLength4999 mm
1825 mmWidth1881 mm
1765 mmHeight1481 mm
1590 KgWeight1725 Kg
2620 mmWheelbase3048 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Mazda Tribute and 2004 Chrysler 300 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda Tribute leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…