1999 • Mazda
Scrum
Mazda Scrum 0.7 12V Turbo (58 Hp) 1999Overall Score51.5/100
1999 Mazda Scrum vs 2000 Mazda Az-wagon Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Mazda
Az-wagon
Mazda Az-wagon 0.7 12V Turbo (60 Hp) 2000Overall Score52.5/100
WINNER
Mazda Az-wagon
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
51.5–52.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Mazda ScrumSpecificationMazda Az-wagon
MazdaMakeMazda
ScrumModelAz-wagon
1999Model year2000
MinivanBody typeMinivan
4Seats4
4Doors3/5
Performance
Mazda ScrumSpecificationMazda Az-wagon
130 km/hTop speed135 km/h
657 ccEngine displacement657 cc
58 HPPower60 HP
86 NmTorque83 Nm
3Cylinders3
Fuel & Consumption
Mazda ScrumSpecificationMazda Az-wagon
PetrolFuel typePetrol
37 ltFuel tank30 lt
—Urban consumption8 lt
—Extra-urban consumption4 lt
5,5 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Mazda ScrumSpecificationMazda Az-wagon
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
3Gears5
145/80 R12 STyre size155/65 R13
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Mazda ScrumSpecificationMazda Az-wagon
3295 mmLength3395 mm
1395 mmWidth1475 mm
1870 mmHeight1690 mm
810 KgWeight750 Kg
1840 mmWheelbase2360 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1999 Mazda Scrum and 2000 Mazda Az-wagon approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mazda Az-wagon leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…