DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Mazda Az-wagon vs 1999 Mazda Scrum Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda Az-wagon

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

52.5–51.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeMazda
Az-wagonModelScrum
2000Model year1999
MinivanBody typeMinivan
4Seats4
3/5Doors4

Performance

135 km/hTop speed130 km/h
657 ccEngine displacement657 cc
60 HPPower58 HP
83 NmTorque86 Nm
3Cylinders3

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
30 ltFuel tank37 lt
8 ltUrban consumption—
4 ltExtra-urban consumption—
—Average consumption5,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears3
155/65 R13Tyre size145/80 R12 S
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3395 mmLength3295 mm
1475 mmWidth1395 mm
1690 mmHeight1870 mm
750 KgWeight810 Kg
2360 mmWheelbase1840 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Mazda Az-wagon and 1999 Mazda Scrum approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda Az-wagon leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…