2000 • Mazda
Scrum
Mazda Scrum 0.7 12V (42 Hp) 2000Overall Score52.5/100
2000 Mazda Scrum vs 1998 Subaru Vivio Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1998 • Subaru
Vivio
Subaru Vivio 1998Overall Score51.5/100
WINNER
Mazda Scrum
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
52.5–51.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Mazda ScrumSpecificationSubaru Vivio
MazdaMakeSubaru
ScrumModelVivio
2000Model year1998
MinivanBody typeHatchback
4Seats5
4Doors3/5
Performance
Mazda ScrumSpecificationSubaru Vivio
125 km/hTop speed133 km/h
657 ccEngine displacement658 cc
42 HPPower42 HP
57 NmTorque52 Nm
3Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Mazda ScrumSpecificationSubaru Vivio
PetrolFuel typePetrol
37 ltFuel tank32 lt
—Extra-urban consumption6,7 lt
4,4 ltAverage consumption5,1 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Mazda ScrumSpecificationSubaru Vivio
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
145/80 R12 STyre size145/70 R12
YesABS—
Dimensions
Mazda ScrumSpecificationSubaru Vivio
3295 mmLength3295 mm
1395 mmWidth1395 mm
1870 mmHeight1385 mm
780 KgWeight700 Kg
1840 mmWheelbase2310 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Mazda Scrum and 1998 Subaru Vivio approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mazda Scrum leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…