1999 • Subaru
Pleo
Subaru Pleo 0.66 (45 Hp) 1999Overall Score51.5/100
1999 Subaru Pleo vs 2000 Mazda Scrum Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Mazda
Scrum
Mazda Scrum 0.7 12V (42 Hp) 2000Overall Score52.5/100
WINNER
Mazda Scrum
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
51.5–52.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Subaru PleoSpecificationMazda Scrum
SubaruMakeMazda
PleoModelScrum
1999Model year2000
HatchbackBody typeMinivan
4Seats4
5Doors4
Performance
Subaru PleoSpecificationMazda Scrum
130 km/hTop speed125 km/h
658 ccEngine displacement657 cc
45 HPPower42 HP
56 NmTorque57 Nm
4Cylinders3
Fuel & Consumption
Subaru PleoSpecificationMazda Scrum
PetrolFuel typePetrol
32 ltFuel tank37 lt
7 ltUrban consumption—
5 ltExtra-urban consumption—
—Average consumption4,4 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Subaru PleoSpecificationMazda Scrum
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
145/70 R12Tyre size145/80 R12 S
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Subaru PleoSpecificationMazda Scrum
3395 mmLength3295 mm
1475 mmWidth1395 mm
1580 mmHeight1870 mm
770 KgWeight780 Kg
2310 mmWheelbase1840 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1999 Subaru Pleo and 2000 Mazda Scrum approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mazda Scrum leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…