2000 • Mazda
Scrum
Mazda Scrum 0.7 12V (42 Hp) 2000Overall Score52.5/100
2000 Mazda Scrum vs 1999 Mitsubishi Toppo Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1999 • Mitsubishi
Toppo
Mitsubishi Toppo 1999Overall Score51.5/100
WINNER
Mazda Scrum
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
52.5–51.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Mazda ScrumSpecificationMitsubishi Toppo
MazdaMakeMitsubishi
ScrumModelToppo
2000Model year1999
MinivanBody typeHatchback
4Seats5
4Doors3
Performance
Mazda ScrumSpecificationMitsubishi Toppo
125 km/hTop speed0 km/h
657 ccEngine displacement657 cc
42 HPPower40 HP
57 NmTorque51 Nm
3Cylinders3
Fuel & Consumption
Mazda ScrumSpecificationMitsubishi Toppo
PetrolFuel typePetrol
37 ltFuel tank32 lt
4,4 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Mazda ScrumSpecificationMitsubishi Toppo
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
145/80 R12 STyre size135/80 R12 S
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Mazda ScrumSpecificationMitsubishi Toppo
3295 mmLength3295 mm
1395 mmWidth1395 mm
1870 mmHeight1765 mm
780 KgWeight670 Kg
1840 mmWheelbase2260 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Mazda Scrum and 1999 Mitsubishi Toppo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mazda Scrum leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…