2000 • Mazda
Scrum
Mazda Scrum 0.7 12V (42 Hp) 2000Overall Score52.5/100
2000 Mazda Scrum vs 1999 Mazda Scrum Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1999 • Mazda
Scrum
Mazda Scrum 0.7 12V (42 Hp) 1999Overall Score51.5/100
WINNER
Mazda Scrum
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
52.5–51.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Mazda ScrumSpecificationMazda Scrum
MazdaMakeMazda
ScrumModelScrum
2000Model year1999
MinivanBody typeMinivan
4Seats4
4Doors4
Performance
Mazda ScrumSpecificationMazda Scrum
125 km/hTop speed125 km/h
657 ccEngine displacement657 cc
42 HPPower42 HP
57 NmTorque57 Nm
3Cylinders3
Fuel & Consumption
Mazda ScrumSpecificationMazda Scrum
PetrolFuel typePetrol
37 ltFuel tank37 lt
4,4 ltAverage consumption4,4 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Mazda ScrumSpecificationMazda Scrum
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
145/80 R12 STyre size145/80 R12 S
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Mazda ScrumSpecificationMazda Scrum
3295 mmLength3295 mm
1395 mmWidth1395 mm
1870 mmHeight1870 mm
780 KgWeight780 Kg
1840 mmWheelbase1840 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Mazda Scrum and 1999 Mazda Scrum approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mazda Scrum leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…