2000 • Mazda
Scrum
Mazda Scrum 0.7 12V (42 Hp) 2000Overall Score52.5/100
2000 Mazda Scrum vs 1999 Mazda Carol Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1999 • Mazda
Carol
Mazda Carol 0.7 12V (46 Hp) 1999Overall Score51.5/100
WINNER
Mazda Scrum
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
52.5–51.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Mazda ScrumSpecificationMazda Carol
MazdaMakeMazda
ScrumModelCarol
2000Model year1999
MinivanBody typeHatchback
4Seats4
4Doors3/5
Performance
Mazda ScrumSpecificationMazda Carol
125 km/hTop speed0 km/h
657 ccEngine displacement657 cc
42 HPPower46 HP
57 NmTorque57 Nm
3Cylinders3
Fuel & Consumption
Mazda ScrumSpecificationMazda Carol
PetrolFuel typePetrol
37 ltFuel tank30 lt
4,4 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Mazda ScrumSpecificationMazda Carol
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
145/80 R12 STyre size155/65 R13 75 S
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Mazda ScrumSpecificationMazda Carol
3295 mmLength3395 mm
1395 mmWidth1475 mm
1870 mmHeight1450 mm
780 KgWeight680 Kg
1840 mmWheelbase2360 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Mazda Scrum and 1999 Mazda Carol approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mazda Scrum leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…