2000 • Mazda
Scrum
Mazda Scrum 0.7 12V (42 Hp) 2000Overall Score52.5/100
2000 Mazda Scrum vs 1997 Maruti Omni Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1997 • Maruti
Omni
Maruti Omni 0.8 (37 Hp) 1997Overall Score51.5/100
WINNER
Mazda Scrum
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
52.5–51.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Mazda ScrumSpecificationMaruti Omni
MazdaMakeMaruti
ScrumModelOmni
2000Model year1997
MinivanBody typeMinivan
4Seats4
4Doors4
Performance
Mazda ScrumSpecificationMaruti Omni
125 km/hTop speed100 km/h
657 ccEngine displacement796 cc
42 HPPower37 HP
57 NmTorque62 Nm
3Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Mazda ScrumSpecificationMaruti Omni
PetrolFuel typePetrol
37 ltFuel tank36 lt
4,4 ltAverage consumption6 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Mazda ScrumSpecificationMaruti Omni
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears4
145/80 R12 STyre size—
YesABS—
Dimensions
Mazda ScrumSpecificationMaruti Omni
3295 mmLength3280 mm
1395 mmWidth1395 mm
1870 mmHeight1640 mm
780 KgWeight715 Kg
1840 mmWheelbase—
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Mazda Scrum and 1997 Maruti Omni approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mazda Scrum leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…