2000 • Mazda
Scrum
Mazda Scrum 0.7 12V (42 Hp) 2000Overall Score52.5/100
2000 Mazda Scrum vs 1996 Maruti 800 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1996 • Maruti
800
Maruti 800 1996Overall Score51.5/100
WINNER
Mazda Scrum
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
52.5–51.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Mazda ScrumSpecificationMaruti 800
MazdaMakeMaruti
ScrumModel800
2000Model year1996
MinivanBody typeHatchback
4Seats5
4Doors5
Performance
Mazda ScrumSpecificationMaruti 800
125 km/hTop speed0 km/h
657 ccEngine displacement796 cc
42 HPPower35 HP
57 NmTorque56 Nm
3Cylinders3
Fuel & Consumption
Transmission & Chassis
Dimensions
Mazda ScrumSpecificationMaruti 800
3295 mmLength—
1395 mmWidth—
1870 mmHeight—
780 KgWeight—
1840 mmWheelbase—
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Mazda Scrum and 1996 Maruti 800 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mazda Scrum leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…