2000 • Mazda
Scrum
Mazda Scrum 0.7 12V (42 Hp) 2000Overall Score52.5/100
2000 Mazda Scrum vs 1996 Fiat Cinquecento Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1996 • Fiat
Cinquecento
Fiat Cinquecento 0.7 i (31 Hp) 1996Overall Score51.5/100
WINNER
Mazda Scrum
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
52.5–51.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Mazda ScrumSpecificationFiat Cinquecento
MazdaMakeFiat
ScrumModelCinquecento
2000Model year1996
MinivanBody typeHatchback
4Seats5
4Doors2
Performance
Mazda ScrumSpecificationFiat Cinquecento
125 km/hTop speed0 km/h
657 ccEngine displacement704 cc
42 HPPower31 HP
57 NmTorque47 Nm
3Cylinders2
Fuel & Consumption
Mazda ScrumSpecificationFiat Cinquecento
PetrolFuel typePetrol
37 ltFuel tank35 lt
4,4 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Mazda ScrumSpecificationFiat Cinquecento
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
145/80 R12 STyre size135/70 R13
YesABS—
Dimensions
Mazda ScrumSpecificationFiat Cinquecento
3295 mmLength3227 mm
1395 mmWidth1487 mm
1870 mmHeight1435 mm
780 KgWeight690 Kg
1840 mmWheelbase2200 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Mazda Scrum and 1996 Fiat Cinquecento approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mazda Scrum leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…