1999 • Mazda
Scrum
Mazda Scrum 0.7 12V (42 Hp) 1999Overall Score51.5/100
1999 Mazda Scrum vs 2000 Maruti Omni Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Maruti
Omni
Maruti Omni 0.8 i (37 Hp) 2000Overall Score52.5/100
WINNER
Maruti Omni
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
51.5–52.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Mazda ScrumSpecificationMaruti Omni
MazdaMakeMaruti
ScrumModelOmni
1999Model year2000
MinivanBody typeMinivan
4Seats4
4Doors4
Performance
Mazda ScrumSpecificationMaruti Omni
125 km/hTop speed110 km/h
657 ccEngine displacement796 cc
42 HPPower37 HP
57 NmTorque61 Nm
3Cylinders3
Fuel & Consumption
Mazda ScrumSpecificationMaruti Omni
PetrolFuel typePetrol
37 ltFuel tank36 lt
4,4 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Mazda ScrumSpecificationMaruti Omni
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
145/80 R12 STyre size155/80 R13
YesABS—
Dimensions
Mazda ScrumSpecificationMaruti Omni
3295 mmLength3370 mm
1395 mmWidth1410 mm
1870 mmHeight1640 mm
780 KgWeight740 Kg
1840 mmWheelbase1840 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1999 Mazda Scrum and 2000 Maruti Omni approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Maruti Omni leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…