2003 • Mazda
Roadster
Mazda Roadster 1.8 i (160 Hp) 2003Overall Score62.5/100
2003 Mazda Roadster vs 2003 Kia Optima Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2003 • Kia
Optima
Kia Optima 1.8 (134 Hp) 2003Overall Score63.25/100
WINNER
Kia Optima
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
62.5–63.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Mazda RoadsterSpecificationKia Optima
MazdaMakeKia
RoadsterModelOptima
2003Model year2003
RoadsterBody typeSedan
2Seats5
2Doors4
Performance
Mazda RoadsterSpecificationKia Optima
0 km/hTop speed199 km/h
1839 ccEngine displacement1836 cc
160 HPPower134 HP
170 NmTorque169 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Transmission & Chassis
Mazda RoadsterSpecificationKia Optima
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/60 R14Tyre size195/70 R14
—ABSYes
Dimensions
Mazda RoadsterSpecificationKia Optima
3955 mmLength4745 mm
1680 mmWidth1815 mm
1235 mmHeight1420 mm
1010 KgWeight1390 Kg
2265 mmWheelbase2700 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2003 Mazda Roadster and 2003 Kia Optima approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Kia Optima leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VSKia Optima vs Mazda Roadster2003 and 2003 model yearsImage unavailableVSRenault Samsung SM5 vs Mazda Roadster2003 and 2003 model years
VSToyota Opa vs Mazda Roadster2003 and 2003 model years
VSToyota Vista vs Mazda Roadster2003 and 2003 model years
VSToyota Nadia vs Mazda Roadster2003 and 2003 model yearsComments are loading…