DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Kia Optima vs 2003 Mazda Roadster Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Kia Optima

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

63.25–62.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

KiaMakeMazda
OptimaModelRoadster
2003Model year2003
SedanBody typeRoadster
5Seats2
4Doors2

Performance

199 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1836 ccEngine displacement1839 cc
134 HPPower160 HP
169 NmTorque170 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
65 ltFuel tank48 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/70 R14Tyre size185/60 R14
YesABS—

Dimensions

4745 mmLength3955 mm
1815 mmWidth1680 mm
1420 mmHeight1235 mm
1390 KgWeight1010 Kg
2700 mmWheelbase2265 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Kia Optima and 2003 Mazda Roadster approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Kia Optima leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…