DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Mazda Roadster vs 2004 Volvo V50 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda Roadster

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

59.5–58.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeVolvo
RoadsterModelV50
2004Model year2004
RoadsterBody typeEstate
2Seats5
2Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h9,6 s
0 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1840 ccEngine displacement1997 cc
146 HPPower136 HP
168 NmTorque320 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
48 ltFuel tank52 lt
—Urban consumption7,6 lt
—Extra-urban consumption4,6 lt
—Average consumption5,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
185/60 R14Tyre size—
—ABSYes

Dimensions

3955 mmLength4522 mm
1680 mmWidth1845 mm
1235 mmHeight1457 mm
1010 KgWeight1472 Kg
2265 mmWheelbase2640 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Mazda Roadster and 2004 Volvo V50 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda Roadster leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…