DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Mazda Roadster vs 2003 Land Rover Freelander Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda Roadster

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

59.5–59.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeLand Rover
RoadsterModelFreelander
2003Model year2003
RoadsterBody typeOff-road vehicle
2Seats5
2Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h11,8 s
0 km/hTop speed160 km/h
1840 ccEngine displacement1796 cc
146 HPPower117 HP
168 NmTorque160 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
48 ltFuel tank60 lt
—Urban consumption12,9 lt
—Extra-urban consumption8,1 lt
—Average consumption9,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
185/60 R14Tyre size195/80 R15 S; 215/75 R15
—ABSYes

Dimensions

3955 mmLength4368 mm
1680 mmWidth1809 mm
1235 mmHeight1708 mm
1010 KgWeight1510 Kg
2265 mmWheelbase2557 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Mazda Roadster and 2003 Land Rover Freelander approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda Roadster leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…