DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1998 Mazda Protege vs 1998 Land Rover Freelander Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda Protege

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

58.5–58.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeLand Rover
ProtegeModelFreelander
1998Model year1998
HatchbackBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h11,9 s
0 km/hTop speed165 km/h
1845 ccEngine displacement1796 cc
135 HPPower120 HP
157 NmTorque165 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank59 lt
—Urban consumption13 lt
—Extra-urban consumption8,6 lt
—Average consumption9,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
—Gears5
—Tyre size195/80 R15
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4035 mmLength4382 mm
1695 mmWidth1805 mm
1170 mmHeight1760 mm
1323 KgWeight1380 Kg
2505 mmWheelbase2560 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1998 Mazda Protege and 1998 Land Rover Freelander approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda Protege leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…