DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1998 Land Rover Freelander vs 1998 Mazda Protege Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda Protege

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

58.25–58.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Land RoverMakeMazda
FreelanderModelProtege
1998Model year1998
Off-road vehicleBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

11,9 s0–100 km/h—
165 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1796 ccEngine displacement1845 cc
120 HPPower135 HP
165 NmTorque157 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
59 ltFuel tank50 lt
13 ltUrban consumption—
8,6 ltExtra-urban consumption—
9,8 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears—
195/80 R15Tyre size—
YesABS—

Dimensions

4382 mmLength4035 mm
1805 mmWidth1695 mm
1760 mmHeight1170 mm
1380 KgWeight1323 Kg
2560 mmWheelbase2505 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1998 Land Rover Freelander and 1998 Mazda Protege approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda Protege leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…