1998 • Mazda
Protege
Mazda Protege 1.6 i (115Hp) 1998Overall Score55.5/100
1998 Mazda Protege vs 1998 Chevrolet Tracker Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1998 • Chevrolet
Tracker
Chevrolet Tracker 1.6 i 16V 4WD (97 Hp) 1998Overall Score55.25/100
WINNER
Mazda Protege
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.
55.5–55.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Mazda ProtegeSpecificationChevrolet Tracker
MazdaMakeChevrolet
ProtegeModelTracker
1998Model year1998
SedanBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
4Doors3
Performance
Mazda ProtegeSpecificationChevrolet Tracker
0 km/hTop speed150 km/h
1598 ccEngine displacement1590 cc
115 HPPower97 HP
135 NmTorque133 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Mazda ProtegeSpecificationChevrolet Tracker
PetrolFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank56 lt
—Urban consumption14 lt
—Extra-urban consumption8 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Mazda ProtegeSpecificationChevrolet Tracker
Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
—Gears5
—Tyre size195/75 R15
—ABSYes
Dimensions
Mazda ProtegeSpecificationChevrolet Tracker
4335 mmLength3650 mm
1695 mmWidth1630 mm
1420 mmHeight1650 mm
—Weight1235 Kg
2605 mmWheelbase2200 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1998 Mazda Protege and 1998 Chevrolet Tracker approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mazda Protege leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…