DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1998 Chevrolet Tracker vs 1998 Mazda Protege Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda Protege

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

55.25–55.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ChevroletMakeMazda
TrackerModelProtege
1998Model year1998
Off-road vehicleBody typeSedan
5Seats5
3Doors4

Performance

150 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1590 ccEngine displacement1598 cc
97 HPPower115 HP
133 NmTorque135 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
56 ltFuel tank50 lt
14 ltUrban consumption—
8 ltExtra-urban consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears—
195/75 R15Tyre size—
YesABS—

Dimensions

3650 mmLength4335 mm
1630 mmWidth1695 mm
1650 mmHeight1420 mm
1235 KgWeight—
2200 mmWheelbase2605 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1998 Chevrolet Tracker and 1998 Mazda Protege approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda Protege leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…