2004 • Mazda
Protege
Mazda Protege 1.5 i (113 Hp) 2004Overall Score56.5/100
2004 Mazda Protege vs 2004 Ford C-Max Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2004 • Ford
C-Max
Ford C-Max 1.6 TDCi (109 Hp) 2004Overall Score57.25/100
WINNER
Ford C-Max
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
56.5–57.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Mazda ProtegeSpecificationFord C-Max
MazdaMakeFord
ProtegeModelC-Max
2004Model year2004
EstateBody typeMPV
5Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Mazda ProtegeSpecificationFord C-Max
—0–100 km/h11,3 s
0 km/hTop speed185 km/h
1498 ccEngine displacement1560 cc
113 HPPower109 HP
140 NmTorque240 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Mazda ProtegeSpecificationFord C-Max
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
50 ltFuel tank55 lt
—Urban consumption6,3 lt
—Extra-urban consumption4,1 lt
—Average consumption4,9 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Mazda ProtegeSpecificationFord C-Max
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
—Gears5
—Tyre size205/55 R16
—ABSYes
Dimensions
Mazda ProtegeSpecificationFord C-Max
4200 mmLength4330 mm
1695 mmWidth1820 mm
1420 mmHeight1600 mm
—Weight1292 Kg
2610 mmWheelbase2640 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2004 Mazda Protege and 2004 Ford C-Max approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford C-Max leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…