2004 • Citroen
Xsara
Citroen Xsara 1.6 HDI FAP (109 Hp) 2004Overall Score57.25/100
2004 Citroen Xsara vs 2004 Mazda Protege Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2004 • Mazda
Protege
Mazda Protege 1.5 i (113 Hp) 2004Overall Score56.5/100
WINNER
Citroen Xsara
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
57.25–56.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Citroen XsaraSpecificationMazda Protege
CitroenMakeMazda
XsaraModelProtege
2004Model year2004
MinivanBody typeEstate
5Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Citroen XsaraSpecificationMazda Protege
11,9 s0–100 km/h—
183 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1560 ccEngine displacement1498 cc
109 HPPower113 HP
240 NmTorque140 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Citroen XsaraSpecificationMazda Protege
DieselFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank50 lt
6,3 ltUrban consumption—
4,1 ltExtra-urban consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Citroen XsaraSpecificationMazda Protege
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears—
185/65 R15Tyre size—
YesABS—
Dimensions
Citroen XsaraSpecificationMazda Protege
4257 mmLength4200 mm
1751 mmWidth1695 mm
1637 mmHeight1420 mm
1315 KgWeight—
2760 mmWheelbase2610 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2004 Citroen Xsara and 2004 Mazda Protege approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Citroen Xsara leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…