2004 • Mazda
Protege
Mazda Protege 1.5 i (113 Hp) 2004Overall Score56.5/100
2004 Mazda Protege vs 2004 Citroen Xsara Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2004 • Citroen
Xsara
Citroen Xsara 1.6 HDI FAP (109 Hp) 2004Overall Score57.25/100
WINNER
Citroen Xsara
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
56.5–57.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Mazda ProtegeSpecificationCitroen Xsara
MazdaMakeCitroen
ProtegeModelXsara
2004Model year2004
EstateBody typeMinivan
5Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Mazda ProtegeSpecificationCitroen Xsara
—0–100 km/h11,9 s
0 km/hTop speed183 km/h
1498 ccEngine displacement1560 cc
113 HPPower109 HP
140 NmTorque240 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Mazda ProtegeSpecificationCitroen Xsara
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
50 ltFuel tank60 lt
—Urban consumption6,3 lt
—Extra-urban consumption4,1 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Mazda ProtegeSpecificationCitroen Xsara
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
—Gears5
—Tyre size185/65 R15
—ABSYes
Dimensions
Mazda ProtegeSpecificationCitroen Xsara
4200 mmLength4257 mm
1695 mmWidth1751 mm
1420 mmHeight1637 mm
—Weight1315 Kg
2610 mmWheelbase2760 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2004 Mazda Protege and 2004 Citroen Xsara approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Citroen Xsara leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…