2003 • Mazda
Protege
Mazda Protege 1.5 i (110 Hp) 2003Overall Score56.5/100
2003 Mazda Protege vs 2003 Ford C-Max Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2003 • Ford
C-Max
Ford C-Max 1.6 TDCi (109 Hp) 2003Overall Score57.25/100
WINNER
Ford C-Max
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
56.5–57.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Mazda ProtegeSpecificationFord C-Max
MazdaMakeFord
ProtegeModelC-Max
2003Model year2003
SedanBody typeMPV
5Seats5
4Doors5
Performance
Mazda ProtegeSpecificationFord C-Max
—0–100 km/h11,3 s
0 km/hTop speed185 km/h
1489 ccEngine displacement1560 cc
110 HPPower109 HP
137 NmTorque240 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Mazda ProtegeSpecificationFord C-Max
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
50 ltFuel tank55 lt
—Urban consumption6,3 lt
—Extra-urban consumption4,1 lt
—Average consumption4,9 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Mazda ProtegeSpecificationFord C-Max
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
—Gears5
175/70 R13Tyre size205/55 R16
—ABSYes
Dimensions
Mazda ProtegeSpecificationFord C-Max
4315 mmLength4330 mm
1695 mmWidth1820 mm
1410 mmHeight1600 mm
1020 KgWeight1292 Kg
2610 mmWheelbase2640 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2003 Mazda Protege and 2003 Ford C-Max approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford C-Max leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…