1995 • Mazda
Protege
Mazda Protege 1.3 i (85 Hp) 1995Overall Score51.5/100
1995 Mazda Protege vs 1997 Alfa Romeo 156 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1997 • Alfa Romeo
156
Alfa Romeo 156 1.6 16V T.S. (120 Hp) 1997Overall Score52.5/100
WINNER
Alfa Romeo 156
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
51.5–52.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Mazda ProtegeSpecificationAlfa Romeo 156
MazdaMakeAlfa Romeo
ProtegeModel156
1995Model year1997
HatchbackBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4
Performance
Mazda ProtegeSpecificationAlfa Romeo 156
—0–100 km/h10,5 s
0 km/hTop speed200 km/h
1323 ccEngine displacement1598 cc
85 HPPower120 HP
110 NmTorque144 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Mazda ProtegeSpecificationAlfa Romeo 156
PetrolFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank63 lt
—Urban consumption11,4 lt
—Extra-urban consumption6,4 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Mazda ProtegeSpecificationAlfa Romeo 156
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
—Gears5
—Tyre size185/65R15
—ABSYes
Dimensions
Mazda ProtegeSpecificationAlfa Romeo 156
4035 mmLength4430 mm
1695 mmWidth1745 mm
1170 mmHeight1415 mm
1323 KgWeight1230 Kg
2505 mmWheelbase2595 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1995 Mazda Protege and 1997 Alfa Romeo 156 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Alfa Romeo 156 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…