1993 • Geo
Storm
Geo Storm 1.6i Turbo (130 Hp) 1993Overall Score52.5/100
1993 Geo Storm vs 1995 Mazda Protege Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1995 • Mazda
Protege
Mazda Protege 1.3 i (85 Hp) 1995Overall Score51.5/100
WINNER
Geo Storm
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
52.5–51.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Geo StormSpecificationMazda Protege
GeoMakeMazda
StormModelProtege
1993Model year1995
CoupeBody typeHatchback
4Seats5
2Doors5
Performance
Geo StormSpecificationMazda Protege
12,4 s0–100 km/h—
200 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1588 ccEngine displacement1323 cc
130 HPPower85 HP
0 NmTorque110 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Geo StormSpecificationMazda Protege
PetrolFuel typePetrol
47 ltFuel tank50 lt
13 ltUrban consumption—
8 ltExtra-urban consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Geo StormSpecificationMazda Protege
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears—
205/50 R15Tyre size—
YesABS—
Dimensions
Geo StormSpecificationMazda Protege
4150 mmLength4035 mm
1695 mmWidth1695 mm
1300 mmHeight1170 mm
1010 KgWeight1323 Kg
2450 mmWheelbase2505 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1993 Geo Storm and 1995 Mazda Protege approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Geo Storm leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…