1995 • Mazda
Protege
Mazda Protege 1.3 i (85 Hp) 1995Overall Score51.5/100
1995 Mazda Protege vs 1993 Geo Storm Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1993 • Geo
Storm
Geo Storm 1.6i Turbo (130 Hp) 1993Overall Score52.5/100
WINNER
Geo Storm
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
51.5–52.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Mazda ProtegeSpecificationGeo Storm
MazdaMakeGeo
ProtegeModelStorm
1995Model year1993
HatchbackBody typeCoupe
5Seats4
5Doors2
Performance
Mazda ProtegeSpecificationGeo Storm
—0–100 km/h12,4 s
0 km/hTop speed200 km/h
1323 ccEngine displacement1588 cc
85 HPPower130 HP
110 NmTorque0 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Mazda ProtegeSpecificationGeo Storm
PetrolFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank47 lt
—Urban consumption13 lt
—Extra-urban consumption8 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Mazda ProtegeSpecificationGeo Storm
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
—Gears5
—Tyre size205/50 R15
—ABSYes
Dimensions
Mazda ProtegeSpecificationGeo Storm
4035 mmLength4150 mm
1695 mmWidth1695 mm
1170 mmHeight1300 mm
1323 KgWeight1010 Kg
2505 mmWheelbase2450 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1995 Mazda Protege and 1993 Geo Storm approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Geo Storm leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…